Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Real GDP Per Capita 1790 to Present

I had received a challenge from Rammage over at Atlas Blogged. To find Real GDP per capita from 1776 to the present.

I failed him miserably since the only data set I could find went back to 1790.


Oh, what a bad economist am I.

7 comments:

Andrew L said...

Great chart! I'm surprised, though, that there doesn't seem to have been much of an increase in the years around 1800, which would have been about the time the US got settled in and established as a free nation. Instead, it looks like the economy only started to improve sometime after the Civil war.

Also, it's odd that the growth didn't become more volatile right around then, the way it did during WWII. Is the chart for America only, or for the whole world?

At any rate, it's cool to see everything laid out nicely with respect to time.

Anonymous said...

Any chance of throwing that data on a logarithmic scale?

Alfred T. Mahan said...

I'm not that surprised, actually; the United States was still primarily an agricultural nation until well after the Civil War, and we were on the gold standard until FDR took us off during the "Great" Depression (which frankly wasn't nearly as bad as some of the earlier ones), which tended to limit growth in an economy based around a commodity-based system of exchange.

Admittedly, it kept inflation way low, so there were tradeoffs.

Anonymous said...

Try this one.

http://www.mkbergman.com/wp-content/themes/ai3/images/2006Posts/060727a_HistoricalGDPGrowth.gif

Anonymous said...

http://www.mkbergman.com/?m=200607

It is world data, but interesting.

Anonymous said...

It is 38 years after the moon landing. Shouldn't economists be able to figure out planned obsolescence is going on in the automobile industry? Galbraith mentioned it in 1959.

Of course in 1959 there weren't 230,000,000 cars in the US. How much do Americans lose on depreciation of automobiles every year? When consumers replace worn out cars the new ones get added to GDP but the worn out cars don't get subtracted from anywhere.

I guess economists don't have to do algebra correctly.

http://discussions.pbs.org/viewtopic.pbs?t=28529

psikey

Anonymous said...

Right, but this describes the whole US mass/popular consumer economy--especially the great economic frontier, networked electronics. Tens of millions of Americans replace their smartphones every 2 years, some even more frequently. There's obvious efficiency issues here but it's difficult to get to close to them with policy because of certain sensitive constituencies.